Showing posts with label GDP growth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GDP growth. Show all posts

Friday, November 09, 2012

India’s is the next growth story

For years, ever since the UPA came to power - and even before that when NDA ruled - PMs and FMs have espoused that India’s is the next growth story.

But first, a quick summary of the economic growth story. The February 2008 IMF India Assessment report mentioned that “over the past five years, average growth of 8¾% has made India one of the world’s fastest growing economies.” The report addsed that inflation has “remained contained,” current account deficits have been at a moderate level, factors which, as per IMF, “pay tribute to India’s sound macroeconomic policies and past structural reforms.” Although India’s growth rates have remained high, they have been relatively subdued – if we can call it that – in recent quarters. India’s GDP grew by a smashing 9.3% in Q1 2007-08 (but it was lower than 9.6% in Q1 2006-07). In Q2 2007-08, it was even lower at 8.9% (compared to 10.2% in Q2 2006-07). The IMF forecast for India’s GDP growth in this fiscal is 8.75%. Subir Gokarn, Chief Economist, Standard & Poor’s, Asia Pacific, told B&E, “India’s GDP growth is expected to be 8.6% during FY 2007-08.” Dharmakriti Joshi, Director and Principal Economist, Crisil, commented, “We expect the GDP growth to moderate further in 2008-09... to a little over 8%.” The cumulative GDP figure at current market prices at the end of Q2 2007-08 had reached $1.09 trillion. Interestingly, while India’s GDP – in PPP terms – in FY 2006-07 was $3.8 trillion, the World Bank downgraded it by 38% in January 2008 (quoting recalculation using a new methodology) to $2.34 trillion.

Comparatively, the manufacturing sector – as per RBI Q3 review – recorded “a lower growth of 9.8% during April-November 2007, as compared to 11.8% during April-November 2006.” Dr. Dalip Kumar, Consultant, NCAER, revealed, “Non-farm activities, manufacturing and services... are either slowing down or just maintaining their trajectory of growth.” RBI itself accepts that the slowdown is due to “decelerated/negative growth in 11 out of the 17 manufacturing industry groups”; the 11 sectors account for a whopping 49.3% weight in the Index of Industrial Production (IIP). Frankling Templeton, though, does mention in its January 2008 ‘Market Snapshot’ that “the composition of IIP hasn’t changed to reflect new economic drivers and sectors; and the government is expected to introduce a new index with... new weights and a wider basket of items.”


Source : IIPM Editorial, 2012.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

 
IIPM : The B-School with a Human Face

Monday, August 20, 2012

RUSSIA: ANTI-PUTIN WAVE

Putin should resign to change his perception as a ruthless power hungry political leader; and then (rightfully) reclaim the throne a few months later – that’s a sleight Putin knows too well and has practised well in the past

The recent killings of human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov and newspaper reporter Anastasiya Baburova have further added fuel to fire and led to tensions with the EU President. Amnesty noted with grave concern in 2007 how Putin was rolling back civil rights in Russia. Another critical blot has been the continued trial of Russia’s richest man, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, because he allegedly financed Putin’s opponents, apart from committing corporate fraud – he’s now serving an eight year sentence.

But then, there is a flamboyant other side to Putin too. Truly, Russia has enjoyed one of the most prosperous periods of growth under Putin after Boris Yeltsin left the country in a sorry state. Between 2000-2008, GDP growth peaked at 10% (2000) and saw 5 years of GDP growth over 7% (APEC). He devised strong policies in fiscal reforms, oil prices, and external financing. Russia experienced a PPP growth of 72%, poverty rates dropped by 50% and average salaries increased by eight times. So Putin’s enduring popularity, by far the highest in the world, isn’t surprising (In 2007, Putin’s approval rating was 81%; even in late 2009, post recession, it was still 65%; Levada Center public opinion surveys). Various surveys revealed that Russians felt the country was “more democratic” under Putin than during the Yeltsin or Gorbachev years.

Given all that, there can be no denying that for all it matters, there is no better choice than Putin that Russia currently has for a leader. Then how does one handle the increasing protests? The solution is pretty simple – and one that Putin has practised well in the past. Putin should resign from his position (for a few months perhaps) and let the protest brigade run out of steam. Once that happens, he should quietly step back and reclaim the throne. Well, it has been rightfully his for years...